The single judge listed this appeal filed under Section 37(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The appeal was not prosecuted by the appellant's counsel and was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.DESAI
M.F.A.NO.1042/2018 (AA)
BETWEEN:
MR. MAZHAR PASHA SON OF LATE MR.ABDUL JALEEL AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1, ‘A’ STREET COOLS ROAD CROSS MUNESWARA TEMPLE STREET BANGALORE – 560 005
… APPELLANT
(BY SRI.SHREERAM T.NAYAK, ADV. AND SRI PUTTANARASEGOWDA H.P., ADV., (ABSENT))
AND:
MR.ABDULLA SIDDIQ SON OF LATE DR.FAROOQ AHMED AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1019 25TH MAIN, 4TH ‘T’ BLOCK JAYANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 041
… RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.SHANTESH AVAJI, ADV.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37(c) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DT.01.01.2018 PASSED IN A.S.NO.117/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-45),
: 2 :
DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED U/S 34 OF ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY S. SUJATHA J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Even on the earlier occasions, the matter was either adjourned at the request of learned counsel for the appellant or to secure the presence of learned counsel for the appellant.
Today, the matter called twice. Even in the second round, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
HJ
MR. MAZHAR PASHA
MR ABDULLA SIDDIQ
S. SUJATHA
P.N. DESAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
