The Karnataka High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appellant's appeal filed under Section 260A against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's order allowing relief under Section 263 while the Revenue's challenge was pending.
Appeal dismissed; substantial question of law answered in favor of assessee against Revenue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 01ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
I.T.A.No.449/2016
BETWEEN :
(BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV. A/W SRI T.N.C.SRIDHAR, ADV. FOR SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADV.)
AND :
M/s SUBEX LTD., RMZ ECOWORLD, DEVARABISANAHALLI, OUTER RING ROAD, BANGALORE-560 037. PAN: AABCS 9255R. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI CHYTHANYA K.K., ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 01.04.2016 PASSED IN ITA NO.1165/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. PRAYING TO
DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON'BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT & SET ASIDE THE APPELLATE ORDERS DATED 01.04.2016 THE ITAT, 'C' BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1165/BANG/2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-09.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT, THIS DAY, S. SUJATHA, J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
This appeal is filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [‘Act’ for short] challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” Bench, Bangalore ['Tribunal' for short] dated 01.04.2016 passed in ITA No.1165/Bang/2015 relating to the assessment year 2008-09.
“[1] Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, Tribunal is right in allowing relief to the assessee on the additions made consequent to order passed under Section 263 of the Act, when the order of the Tribunal dated 19.06.2015 has been
assailed by the Revenue before this Hon’ble Court and has not reached the finality?”
In view of the order passed by this Court in ITA No.684/2015 and ITA No.378/2015, the substantial question of law is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.
In the result, appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
NC.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Tribunal is right in allowing relief on additions made under Section 263 when its order assailed by Revenue has not reached finality.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI
M/s SUBEX LTD.
S. SUJATHA
RAVI V. HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
