Appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from orders for Assessment Year 2009-10 were dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee, with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2021
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
I. T. A. NO.317 OF 2016
C/W
I. T. A. NO.316 OF 2016
IN I.T.A.NO.317/2016
BETWEEN:
M/S R K DEVELOPERS D.NO.4-6-577/31, MAHENDRA ARCADE, KARANGALPADY, MANGALURU.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 (2), C.R.BUILDING, ATTAVAR, MANGALURU-575 001.
….RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 09.03.2016 PASSED IN M.P.NO.120/BANG/2015 ARISING OUT OF ITA No.915/BANG/2013 AND 1096/BANG/2015, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.
IN I.T.A.NO.316/2016
BETWEEN:
M/S R K DEVELOPERS D.NO.4-6-577/31, MAHENDRA ARCADE, KARANGALPADY, MANGALURU.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. NARENDRA SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1 (2), C.R.BUILDING, ATTAVAR, MANGALURU-575 001.
….RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J NEERALGI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 18.07.2014 PASSED IN M.P.NO.120/BANG/2015 ARISING OUT OF ITA No.915/BANG/2013 AND 1096/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-2010.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
3
JUDGMENT
Mr. Narendra Sharma, learned counsel for Mr. M.Lava, learned counsel for the assessee.
Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, learned counsel for the Revenue.
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the appeals.
reasons assigned in the memo, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to revive the same, if occasion so arises.
SD/JUDGE
SD/JUDGE
RD
M/s R K Developers
Income Tax Officer Ward 1 (2)
Allok Aradhe
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
