The High Court dismissed a Criminal Revision Petition filed under the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act and CPC. The petitioner failed to comply with a peremptory order dated 5.6.2018 by this Court regarding office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.R.P.NO.326 OF 2017 (TAX)
IN
S.T.A.NO.1880 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
M V GANESH PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SRI SHIVA SHAKTI NILAYA, TILAK PARK ROAD, VIJAYAPURA EXTN., CHIKMAGALUR.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI SRIVASTHAVA H.K, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
CHIEF SECRETARY,
2
VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.
3
W/O B.N NATARAJ, NO.1, SHALIVAHANA ROAD, NAZARABADH, MYSORE.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS C.R.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 55 (1) OF KARNATAKA AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX ACT, 1957 READWITH ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READWITH 114 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND; ISSUE APPROPRIATE ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED NOTICES DATED 29.06.2012 PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE A IN STA 1800/2004 ISSUE SUCH OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE INCLUDING THE COST OF THIS WRIT PETITION, TO SECURE THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS C.R.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
4
ORDER
In view of the peremptory order dated 5.6.2018 passed by a bench of this Court, the office objections have not been complied with, the petition stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
HR
M V GANESH PRASAD
KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
STATE OF KARANTAKA
ALOK ARADHE
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
