The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in C.R.P.No.183/2019 (IO), dismissed a revision petition under Section 115 CPC as infructuous.
The revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA
C.R.P.No.183/2019 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI. PRASHANT PUJARI, S/O SRI NARAYAN PUJARI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT ‘SHRI GANESH NILAYA’ KARINAHITLU, SHIRUR VILLAGE, KUNDAPUR – 576 201. (BY SRI. NAGENDRA KUMAR.K, ADV.)
… PETITIONER
AND:
SMT. YASMIN @ YASHODHA BALA, W/O SRI. TUGRAL SALIM SHAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT 94/15, KADRI PARK, 2ND FLOOR, S.V.ROAD, IRLA, VILEPARLE(W), MUMBAI – 400 056.
AND ALSO AT: SMT YASMIN @ YASHODHA BALA, W/O SRI. TUGRAL SALIM SHAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT YADTARE VILLAGE, BAINDUR, KUNDAPUR – 576 201. … RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE
2
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:26.07.2018 IN I.A.No.02 BY REJECTING THE PLAINT IN O.S.No.246/2018 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., AT KUNDAPURA, AS PER ANNEXURE-M.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this revision petition has become infructuous and the same be dismissed as such.
Recording his submission, the revision petition is
dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
KTY
Sri. Prashant Pujari
Smt. Yasmin @ Yashodha Bala
N.S. Sanjay Gowda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
