Syed Chman Shah v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashment of FIR rejected. Court granted liberty to petitioners to approach Trial Court for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C. Stay application dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. rejected; liberty granted to file application for discharge under Section 239 Cr.P.C.; Stay application dismissed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.974/2019
BETWEEN:
- SYED CHMAN SHAH
- S/O ABDUL REHAMAN
- AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS
- ABDUL REHAMAN @ SYED ABDUL REHAMAN S/O SYED AMEER SAB
- AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
- GULSHEER UNNISA W/O SYED ABDUL REHAMAN
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash the FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
Whether liberty to seek discharge under Section 239 of Cr.P.C. is warranted despite rejection of Section 482 petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SYED CHMAN SHAH AND OTHERS
- respondent
STATE OF KARNATAKA
- respondent
SYED KAREEM @ AZAM
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/974/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court