The Court dismissed the Criminal Petition as being infructuous after the Police filed a 'B' Report in respect of the complaint filed by the respondent, rendering further proceedings unnecessary regarding the alleged offences.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous due to filing of 'B' Report by Police.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.887 of 2020
BETWEEN
SMT. SUDHA R., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, W/O. MR. BHARATH, RESIDING AT DODDAKARENAHALLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 123.
…PETITIONER
(BY KUM. ALAMPU, ADVOCATE for SRI SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE)
AND
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN P.C.R.No.20/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., KUNIGAL, TUMKUR, FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 417, 418, 420, 506 AND 120B OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE PRODUCED AS DOCUMENT Nos.1 AND 2.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION , THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent No.1-State.
Pending I.A., if any, does not survive for
consideration. Hence, dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
mv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC ought to be dismissed as infructuous due to the filing of a 'B' Report by the Police.
Whether the alleged offences punishable under Sections 406, 417, 418, 420, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code warrant intervention under Section 482 CrPC.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
No case citedReferred
2 provisions across 2 enactments
SMT. SUDHA R.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH KUNIGAL P.S.
K. NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court