Through video/physical hearing, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C., as the appellant's counsel submitted the matter was settled and the appeal was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.839 OF 2011
BETWEEN:
SRI. LOKESH S/O. MARIKALAIAH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT NO.1068, N.G.O. COLONY KAMALANAGARA BANGALORE – 79. ... APPELLANT
[BY SRI. NAGARAJ BABU GODEKAR, FOR SRI. K.B.K. SWAMY, ADVOCATES]
AND:
SRI. NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS NO:3294, 5TH CROSS 1ST STAGE, “C” BLOCK SIDDASHRAMA ROAD GAYATHRINAGARA BANGALORE - 21. ... RESPONDENT [BY SRI. SUDEER, ADVOCATE]
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 06.04.2011 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDL.C.M.M., BANGALORE, IN C.C.NO.25290/2007 – ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE/PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant Sri. Nagaraj Babu Godekar, appearing on behalf of Sri. K.B.K.Swamy, submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and therefore, he is not pressing the appeal.
Criminal Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/JUDGE
Ksm*
Sri. Lokesh S/o. Marikalahiaa (Appellant; represented by Sri. K.B.K. Swamy)
Sri. Nagaraja
Mohammad Nawaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
