Sri. Mohammed Fazal v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The Criminal Bench dismissed a bail petition as withdrawn by the petitioner after noting prior bail grant by the Sessions Judge via memo.
The Criminal Bench dismissed a bail petition as withdrawn by the petitioner after noting prior bail grant by the Sessions Judge via memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8th DAY OF MARCH, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.834 of 2021
BETWEEN
SRI MOHAMMED FAZAL S/O. MOHAMMED AFZAL, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, RESIDENT OF 3RD CROSS, NANJAPPA COLONY, UMARNAGAR, GLASS FACTORY, K.G. HALLI, BANGALORE – 560 045.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAUSHAD PASHA, ADVOCATE for M/S. NAUSHAD PASHA AND ASSOCIATES.)
AND
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY K.G. HALLI P.S., BANGALORE – 560 045, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE – 560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.405/2020 OF KADUGONDANAHALLI POLICE STATION, BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 399 AND 402 OF IPC.
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri Naushad Pasha, learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo in Court today stating that the petitioner has already been granted bail by the learned Sessions Judge and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
Said memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
SD/JUDGE
mv
SRI MOHAMMED FAZAL S/O. MOHAMMED AFZAL
STATE OF KARNATAKA
K.NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court