Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash an FIR. The court dismissed the petition as it had become infructuous due to the filing of a charge sheet and was also dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION No.818 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.SADDAM HUSSAIN.B., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGD ABOUT 56 YERS, GOVT.SCHOOL TEACHER,
18TH WARD OPP TO POLICE STATION ROAD,
2
VIJAYAPAURA TOWN DEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562135
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR R-1 R-2 NOTICE NOT NECESSARY V/O/DT: 24.09.2021)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-A I.e.FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CR.NO.141/2019 BY VIJAYAPURA P.S., BENGALURU PENDING BEFORE THE HONBLE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL AND THESE PETITIOENRS ARE ARRAYED AS ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 417,376,504,506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Issuance of notice to respondent No.2 is not
necessary.
3
C.C.No.3888/2021 and in view of filing of charge sheet, quashing of FIR does not arise.
dismissed as having become infructuous as well as for non-prosecution.
Pending interlocutory applications, if any, does not survive for consideration and accordingly, disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
BMC
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAMMED SABTAIN S @ SAQLAIN S
NASREEN TAJ
STATE
SHAKEELA BI
K. NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
