Dismissed

Mohammed Hussain v. Ruhina Rehaman

Karnataka HC9 Dec 2021CRL.P/8054/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two criminal petitions to quash domestic violence and dowry harassment proceedings were dismissed after the petitioners filed memos seeking withdrawal and withdrew the petitions before the court made the order. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed both petitions.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petitions were dismissed as withdrawn upon filing of memos by the petitioners.

Mohammed Hussain Vs Ruhina Rehaman — Domestic Violence | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8054/2018 c/w

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION No.8053/2018

¶8

In Crl.P.No.8054/2018:

¶9

BETWEEN

¶10

MOHAMMED HUSSAIN S/O. HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

¶11

NASEEM BHANU W/O. MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

¶12

IMRAN SHEIKH S/O. MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

¶13

PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE R/AT. NO. 501, BHAVYA CASTLE 1^ST LANE, KRISHNANAGAR GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 002

¶14

... PETITIONERS

¶15

[BY SRI.RAHUL S. REDDY, ADV.]

¶16

¶17

AND

¶18

RUHINA REHAMAN D/O. H.A.REHAMAN W/O. NAVEEDH SHEIKH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING IN C/O FATHIMA BI, W/O HONNUR SAB, JAMAI MASJID ROAD, BHARAMASAGAR VILLAGE CHITRADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA - 577 519

¶19

... RESPONDENT

¶20

[BY SRI. RANGANATH A.P., ADV.)

¶21

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN CRL.MISC.NO.358/2018 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 12(1) OF PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLATION ACT, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., CHITRADURGA.

¶22

In Crl.P.No.8053/2018:

¶23

BETWEEN

¶24

NASEEM BHANU W/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

¶25

MOHAMMED HUSSAIN S/O HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

¶26

IMRAN SHEIKH S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

¶27

¶28

PETITIONER NOS.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.501 BHAVYA CASTLE 1^ST LANE, KRISHNANAGAR GUNTUR TOWN, GUNTUR ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 002

¶29

... PETITIONERS

¶30

[BY SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADV.]

¶31

AND

¶32

THE STATE BY ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S. REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560 001

¶33

RUHINA NAVEEDH W/O. NAVEEDH SHEIKH AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS R/A NO.3, 10^TH BLOCK 2^ND STAGE, NAGARBHAVI BENGALURU - 560 072

¶34

... RESPONDENTS

¶35

[BY SRI. R.D.RENUKARADHYA, HCGP FOR R1 (PHYSICAL HEARING) SRI. A.P. RANGANATH, ADV. FOR R2]

¶36

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.29/2018 REGISTERED BY THE ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR POLICE STATION ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 498A, 504, 506, 507, 34 OF IPC AND UNDER SECTION 3, 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT AGAINST THE PETITIONERS.

¶37

¶38

THESE CRIMINAL PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶39

ORDER

¶40

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo

¶41

in both the cases seeking to withdraw the criminal petitions.

¶42

Memos are placed on record.

¶43

The criminal petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶44

Sd/JUDGE

¶45

Mohammed Hussain v. Ruhina Rehaman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Hussain v. Ruhina Rehaman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Gowramma Vs the Executive Officer

Sri Giri S Vs the Commissioner

Smt. M.R.Sulochana Vs the State of Karnataka

Atma Sudhir Shetty Vs the State by

M/S. Anukuraa Developers Vs State of Karnataka

Naseem Bhanu Vs the State by