A criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings was dismissed as peremptory orders were not complied with, noting the petition had already been dismissed.
No orders on the petition's merit; dismissed for non-compliance of a peremptory order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.P.NO.6853/2018
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.6853 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT NO.9/18 11TH CROSS, K P AGRAHARA MAIN ROAD, MAGADI ROAD, BANGALORE – 560068
D/O MALESH AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, PETTIONERS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.60, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, SANJAYGANDHI NAGAR, BASAVESHWAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560079
CRL.P.NO.6853/2018
2
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI S.R.SREEPRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.NAMITHA MAHESH B.G., HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THIS HONBLE COURT TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT IN CRIME NO.163/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 44TH ACMM, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 504 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF THE D.P. ACT.
CRL.P.NO.6853/2018
3
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
The peremptory order dated 06.03.2020 is not
complied. Therefore, the petition already stood dismissed. No further orders are required.
Sd/JUDGE
KTY
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohan Kumar N
Nagendra S
Geetha V
Usha V
Devika
State of Karnataka
K.S. Mudgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
