Dismissed

Sri Jeevan Nayaka R v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC1 Apr 2021CRL.P/610/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR registered under Section 498A IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge-sheet.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge-sheet.

Sri Jeevan Nayaka R v Vs the State of Karnataka — Dowry and Cruelty | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2021

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No.610/2021

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI JEEVAN NAYAKA R.V., S/O. SRI VASANTH KUMAR R., AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HOSAGUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD,

¶9

BANGALORE-560 026

¶10

SRI R. VASANTH KUMAR, S/O. LATE RAMACHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HOSAGUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 026

¶11

SMT. B. SAROJA, S/O. SRI VASANTH KUMAR R., AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.17/1, 2ND MAIN ROAD,

¶12

¶13

HOSAGUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BANGALORE-560 026

¶14

… PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI J. ARAVIND BABU, ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND :

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ADUGODI POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 009

¶18

SMT. KAVYASHREE T., W/O. SRI JEEVAN NAYAKA R.V., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1, 6TH BLOCK, SHRAVATHI SANKIRNA, ADUGODI POLICE QUARTERS, BANGALORE-560 030

¶19

… RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI SHOWRI H.R., HCGP FOR R1; SMT. SUNITHA M., ADV., FOR R2.)

¶21

¶22

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR FILED UNDER SECTION 498A OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT REGISTERED AS CR.NO.145/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF VI ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU, COMPLAINT

¶23

¶24

FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT WHICH HAS BEEN REGISTERED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT ADUGODI POLICE STATION.

¶25

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;

¶26

O R D E R

¶27

Learned HCGP for the 1st respondent submits

¶28

that the police have already filed charge-sheet and learned counsel for the petitioner has also not disputed the same.

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

¶30

permission to withdraw the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the charge-sheet.

¶31

3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as

¶32

prayed for.

¶33

SBS*

Sri Jeevan Nayaka R v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Jeevan Nayaka R v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Kumar S Vs State of Karnataka by

Sri. R. Vasudevamurthy Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Anupa Vs Smt Hemavathi

B Madhusudan Vs B R Manjunatha

Shabeena Nayeem Vs Smt. Thaseen Taj

Sri M B Girish Vs Smt Kavitha