The criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR alleging matrimonial offences was dismissed by the High Court of Karnataka after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition.
Criminal petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner granted liberty to file fresh petition against charge-sheet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5399 OF 2021
BETWEEN
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI MOHAMED UMMAR FAROOQ, ADVOCATE)
AND
2
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MAHESH SHETTY, HCGP FOR RESPONDENT/STATE)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO QUASH THE F.I.R IN CRIME NO.36 OF 2021 BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT POLICE, ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED J.M.F.C., 2ND COURT, SHIVAMOGGA, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS HEREIN FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 506 AND 504 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for accepts notice for respondent
No.1-State.
4. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed
as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3
and the same is disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
GBB
1 issue framed by the court
_Whether_ the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC should be allowed to quash the FIR or should be dismissed as withdrawn.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
ASI GABRIEL HENRY
THE STATE
K NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court