The Criminal Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash an FIR as voluntarily withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel.
Disposed the main petition as withdrawn and dismissed the pending interim applications for stay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.528 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
Mr. Anand Gupta S/o Shri Kamlesh Gupta Aged about 28 years R/at No.47, 3rd Floor Radha Reddy Layout Sarjapur Road Bangalore – 560 035
Permanent Address: No.23, Ganj Road Ghohat Thasil Vind Village, Gwalior Madhya Pradesh – 474006.
.. Petitioner
(By Sri. Ayantika Mondal – Advocate)
AND
: 2 :
NGR L/o, 4th Cross Roopena Agrahara Bangalore – 560 068.
..Respondents
(By Sri. Rahul Rai .K – HCGP for R-1; Sri. K.S. Raghuram – Advocate for R-2)
This Criminal Petition filed Under Section, 482 of Cr.P.C praying to quash the FIR in Crime No.539/2017 filed by Bommanahalli Police against the petitioner arraying him as complainant under Section 66E of IT Act, 2000 on the file of I-ACMM, Bangalore.
This petition coming on for Orders this day, the court made the following:
O R D E R
Learned counsel Ms. Ayantika Mondal for petitioner
appears through video conferencing and submits that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the petition as not pressed.
: 3 :
was set into motion for offences reflected in the FIR vide
Annexure-“A”.
Upon disposal of the main petition, I.A.No.1/2020 seeking vacating stay and I.A.No.2/2020 seeking stay, do not survive for consideration and both the I.As stand dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
KS
Anand Gupta
State of Karnataka
Khushboo Gangali
K.Somashekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
