accused No.2 and shifted the dead body in a car and set fire to the car with an intention to cause disappearance of evidence. Even though, there are no eyewitnesses to the alleged incident, the prosecution relying upon the evidence of CW.18 that a luggage was filled in the car and the same was driven by the petitioner and subsequently, the dead body was found. Accused Nos.1 to 4 are the family members. Accused No.2 married the deceased five years back. Due to the matrimonial dispute, accused No.2 is residing with accused Nos.1, 3 and 4. Only on suspicion, the petitioner and other accused were falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents. The co-accused i.e., accused Nos.2 to 4, against whom similar allegations are made, are already enlarged on bail. The petitioner is not required for further investigation. Hence, on parity the petitioner is also entitled to be released on bail. Since the investigation is already completed, detention of the petitioner in custody is not required, except to ensure his presence before the trial Court. He is the permanent resident of the address mentioned in the cause title to the petition and is ready and willing to abide by any of the conditions, that would
