The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing proceedings. The court dismissed the petition because the petitioners were not inclined to pursue them. An interim stay application also stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3844/2019
BETWEEN:
ALL ARE DIRECTORS OF M/S. SKYNET ELECTORNICS PVT. LTD. NO.28, 3, 4, 5TH FLOOR, CENTENARY BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. …PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. SUDHA. B., ADV., APPEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SENIOR LABOUR OFFICER,
2
KARMIKA BHAVAN, 8TH CIRCLE, DAIARY CIRCLE, BANNERUGATTA, BENGALURU - 560029. REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT, BANGALORE-1.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI RAHUL RAI K., HCGP APPEARING THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.N.6262/2019 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 21(3) AND 3(A) PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT AND RULES, PENDING BEFORE THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRAFFIC COURT-1, MAYO HALL AT BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Smt. Sudha B., learned counsel for the petitioners
has appeared through video conference and submitted that the petitioners do not inclined to persuade this matter for seeking quashing of entire proceedings initiated against the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 in C.C.No.6262/2019 which is pending before the court of
3
Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court-I, Mayo Hall, Bengaluru.
made by the learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3, it is deem it appropriate that this petition may be disposed of in terms of non-inclination to persuade this matter. Accordingly, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to withdraw this petition.
Upon disposal of this petition, I.A.No.1/2019 for
seeking stay does not survive for consideration. Consequently, it stands disposed of.
Sd/-
PB
Ganesh Gopal
Giuan Yan
Yang Zuijan
State of Karnataka
K. Somashekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
