The court dismissed the criminal petition seeking bail as the Sessions Court had already granted bail to the accused, rendering the petition unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRL. P. NO. 3272/2020
BETWEEN:
SENTHIL KUMAR S/O SHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO. 7, 18TH CROSS, RAJENDRA NAGAR, N.G.V. KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-563047.
(BY SRI MAEHSH KUMAR K.M. AND SRI TIGADI VEERANNA, ADVOCATES)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HSR LAYOUT P.S. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001.
(BY SRI SHOWRI, H.C.G.P.)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO. 925/2015 BY THE RESPONDENT FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 120(B), 342, 364(A), 323, 506 AND 395 OF IPC & ETC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION PERTAINING TO PRINCIPAL BENCH, BENGALURU COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING AT DHARWAD, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
: 2 :
ORDER
The counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Sessions Court has granted bail to accused No.3 who is the petitioner here. In view of this, this petition does not survive. Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
bvv
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Senthil Kumar S/o Shekar
State of Karnataka
Sreenivas Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
