Criminal appeal filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. was dismissed by the High Court of Karnataka because the appellant's counsel failed to comply with a peremptory order to file office objections within a granted timeframe.
The appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order regarding office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1686 OF 2018 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI SOMANNA L, S/O LAKSHMAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, 2ND FLOOR, GNANABHARATHI MAIN ROAD, NAGARABHAVI CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560072. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI MOHANKUMAR M C, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
SMT. PAVANA, W/O PURUSHOTHAMA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O 11, 9TH CROSS B BLOCK MARUTHI LAYOUT, GANDHI VILLAGE, 2ND STAGE RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560021. …RESPONDENT ****
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.06.2018 PASSED BY THE XIX A.C.M.M., BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.22183/2016
2
– ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I.ACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant absent. No representation.
objections have not been complied until this day. However, as per the order dated 19.02.2020, a week’s time was granted as last chance for compliance of office objections, failing which this appeal shall be listed for dismissal.
stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
BSR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Somantha L
Smt. Pavana
Ashok G. Nijagannavar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
