The Karnataka High Court dismissed the criminal appeal for enlargement of bail as infructuous. The court recorded counsel's submission that the appeal no longer survived and disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1252 OF 2021
BETWEEN
SALLAUDDIN
S/O LATE PASHA @ JAKRIYA SHARIF AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS # 2489, WARD NO.13 SARASWATHI COLONY NANJANGUD TOWN MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 301. …. APPELLANT
[BY SRI.K.R.LINGARAJU, ADVOCATE]
AND
[BY SRI.SHANKAR.H.S., HCGP FOR R-1]
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL
2
IN CR.NO.73/2021 OF NANJANAGUDU TOWN POLICE STATION, MYSURU DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 417, 420, 376, 506 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(w)(1) OF SC/ST (POA) AMENDMENT ACT 2015.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR JUDGMENT THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal does not survive for consideration as it has become infructuous.
2. Learned counsel’s submission is placed on record.
Appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
GVP
Sallaudin
State represented by its SPP
Mallika
Mohammad Nawaz
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
