In a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings, the High Court of Karnataka petition dismissed the petition on grounds that it had become infructuous after the withdrawal of the petition by its own counsel.
The petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF APRIL 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 114 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
Mr. Raghuram K.Beluru Aged 34 years, S/o. Mr. Krishnamurthy Beluru Residing at No.B-008, Parivar Pendent Apartment Supreme Residency Layout, 1st Main, 1st A Cross, Kodichikkanahalli, Bengaluru-560076.
...Petitioner
(By Sri. Anil Kumar H., Advocate)
AND:
Puttenahalli, JP Nagar VII Phase, Bengaluru-560078.
…Respondents
(By Sri. Showri H.R., HCGP, for R1)
This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 of Cr.P.C praying to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.23912/2017 pending before the C.M.M., Bengaluru, as against the petitioner.
This Criminal Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Petitioner’s counsel has filed a memo seeking
withdrawal of the petition on the ground that the petition has become infructuous.
having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
ckl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition praying to quash proceedings should be allowed when it has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Raghuram K. Beluru
The State of Karnataka
S.R. Shruthi
H.P. Sandesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
