The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings because the petitioners' counsel was absent after multiple postings, indicating no interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1020 OF 2021
BETWEEN
…Petitioners
(By Sri A.Vijaya Sai, Advocate - Absent)
AND
2
…Respondents (By Sri. R.D.Renukaradhya, HCGP for R1)
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., praying to quash the order dated 16.07.2016 taking cognizance of offence punishable under Sections 448, 452, 453 and 506 read with 149 of IPC and the entire proceedings in C.C.No.17119/2016 pending on the file of C.M.M., Bengaluru.
This Criminal Petition coming on for orders, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Petitioners’ counsel is absent. This is the 5th
time that the matter has been posted before the court for compliance of office objections. Order sheet shows that the petitioners’ counsel has never appeared since 29.03.2021. Petitioners appear to be not interested. Therefore petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE sd
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the impugned order taking cognizance and entire proceedings in C.C.No.17119/2016.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M.Ramakrishna Reddy
Sreenivasa
State of Karnataka
B.Prakash Bhat
SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
