K. Basha S/O Kashim Sab v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Successive bail petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. rejected. Court distinguished earlier bail order due to marital status, use of sedatives by accused, and complicity in offences against minor girl.
What did the court decide?
Criminal petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is rejected. Bail to accused not granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101542 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
K BASHA @ KARODPATHI BASHA, S/O KASHIM SAB,
AGE: 40 YEARS, R/O BEHIND RAMA TALKIES, NEAR FISH MARKET JANDA KATTE, TQ: HOSPETE,
DIST: BALLARI-583201. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI SABEEL AHMED DARVESHU, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY HOSPET TOWN POLICE STATION, REP BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, DHARWAD – 580 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given the nature of offences and prior orders.
Whether dependents of the accused constitute a valid ground for granting bail in cases of POSCO and rape.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K BASHA @ KARODPATHI BASHA
- respondent
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
- respondent
KUM.CHAND BEE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/101542/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court