Sidrayi Shrimant Nagarale v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal petition for bail was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner without substantive orders on the merits.
The criminal petition for bail was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner without substantive orders on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100655 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
SIDRAYI SHRIMANT NAGARALE AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE, RESIDENT OF DIGGEWADI, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590 001.
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI RAJASHEKHAR BURJI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH RAIBAG POLICE STATION, RAIBAG, RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-590 001, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
… RESPONDENT (BY MS. SEEMA SHIVA NAIK, H.C.G.P.)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF THE CR.P.C. PRAYING TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CRIME NO.71 OF 2020 OF RAIBAG POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 408, 409, 417, 420, 465, 471 AND 120B OF THE IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
2
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of the Court to withdraw the petition.
Memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
kvk
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SIDRAYI SHRIMANT NAGARALE
STATE OF KARNATAKA
NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court