Dismissed

Smt.Nagaratna @ Nagamma W/O Jayaram v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC30 Mar 2021CRL.P/100628/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a petition filed to quash an FIR and complaint in a criminal case involving offences under the IPC. The petitioners sought withdrawal with liberty to challenge the charge sheet; the court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to challenge the charge sheet was granted; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Smt.Nagaratna @ Nagamma W/O Jayaram Vs the State… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Karnataka HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 30^th DAY OF MARCH 2021

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ

¶5

CRL.P. NO.100628 OF 2018

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT. NAGARATNA @ NAGAMMA W/O JAYARAM TIMMASANDRA, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, R/O JAGADISH SHETTAR COLONY, MOMIN PLOT, HUBBALLI, TQ:HUBBALLI, DIST:DHARWAD.

¶8

SRI. JAYARAM TIMMASANDRA AGE:48 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, R/O JAGADISH SHETTAR COLONY, MOMIN PLOT, HUBBALLI, TQ:HUBBALLI, DISTRICT:DHARWAD.

¶9

KUMAR LOKESH S/O JAYARAM TIMMASANDRA AGE:25 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, R/O JAGADISH SHETTAR COLONY, HUBBALLI, TQ:HUBBALLI, DIST:DHARWAD.

¶10

…PETITIONERS

¶11

(BY SRI.HEMANTHKUMAR L HAVARAGI, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR KAMARIPETE POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BNECH AT DHARWAD.

¶14

¶15

SMT. SUVARNA W/O YALLAPPA AGE:48 YEARS, OCC:COOLIE, R/O JAGADISH SHETTAR COLONY, MOMIN PLOT, HUBBALLI, TQ:HUBBALLI, DISTRICT:DHARWAD.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1) (R2-SERVED)

¶17

THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT TO QUASH THE FIR AND COMPLAINT PROCEEDINGS IN KAMARIPETH PS CRIME NO.0024/2016 AND FIR REG.NO.309/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE JMFC 2^ND COURT, HUBBALLI FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 323, 354A, 384, 448, 504, 506, 511 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC.

¶18

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This petition is filed to quash the FIR and complaint registered in Crime No.24/2016 at Kamaripeth Police Station against the petitioners for offence punishable under Sections 323, 354A, 384, 448, 504, 506, 511 read with Section 34 of IPC.

¶21

¶22

It is submitted by the learned HCGP that

¶23

on completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners

¶25

submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to challenge the charge sheet filed against the petitioners. He also submits that petitioner No.1 namely accused No.2 is no more.

¶26

Liberty sought is granted. Petition is

¶27

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Sd/JUDGE

¶29

JTR

Smt.Nagaratna @ Nagamma W/O Jayaram v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.Nagaratna @ Nagamma W/O Jayaram v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Annapurna Distributors Vs Abhraham R. Disoja

Sri Mohan Chandran Nair Vs M/S Chaitra Projects Ltd.

Sri. Sanjay S/O Suresh Chougale Vs the State of Karnataka

Shaik Anwar Sadath Vs State of Karnataka

Nagaraj Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.Gajanan S/O Vasant Kokate Vs State of Karnataka