Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under IPC and POCSO. Counsel withdrew the petition. Court dismissed it as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to approach the Special Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100179/2021
BETWEEN:
DINESH ALIAS BALU S/O TUKARM MIRASHI AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: MASON R/O. DURGADEVI GALLI, RAMANAGAR, TQ. JOIDA, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581186
...PETITIONER
(BY SMT. SUMANGALA A. CHAKALABBI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY MS. SEEMA SHIVA NAIK, HCGP FOR R1; R2 – SERVED)
2
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 439 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON REGULAR BAIL FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 366, 376 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 4 AND 6 OF POCSO ACT, AND SECTION 3(2)(v) OF SC/ST ACT, 2015 IN SPL. CASE NO.93/2018 ARISING OUT OF RAMANAGAR P.S.CRIME NO.26/2018, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON’BLE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, FTSC-I, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR (SPECIAL COURT FOR TRIAL OF CASES FILED UNDER POCSO) ACT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for
some time, seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
Submission of the learned counsel is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach
the Special Court.
Sd/JUDGE
gab
1 provisions across 1 enactments
DINESH ALIAS BALU
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
LAXMI MARUTI BAJANTHRI
K. NATARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
