Riyaz Ahmed Kadarsab Kalburgi v. Ibrahimsab Husensab Siddi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous because the matter was settled before the Lok Adalath.
The High Court dismissed the criminal petition as infructuous because the matter was settled before the Lok Adalath.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P. KRISHNA BHAT CRL.P. NO.100046/2018
BETWEEN:
1 . RIYAZ AHMED KADARSAB KALBURGI AGE:47 YEARS, OCC:TAILOR R/O:LAXMESHWAR (BANU MARKET) TQ:SHIRAHATTI, DIST:GADAG
2 . SHAFIZ AHMED GAFARSAB MANJALAPUR AGE:47 YEARS, OCC:BUSINESS, R/O:LAXMESHWAR TQ:SHIRAHATTI, DIST:GADAG. (BY SRI. N.J.APPANNAVAR, & SRI.LAXMAN T MANTAGANI, ADVS.) AND
...PETITIONERS
1 . IBRAHIMSAB HUSENSAB SIDDI AGE:67 YEARS, OCC:AGRL, R/O:LAXMESHWAR, TQ:SHIRAHATTI, DIST:GADAG
2 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY PSI LAXMESHWAR POXICE STATION LAXMESHWAR,
REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT PREMISES, DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.S.S.KOLIWAD ADV. FOR R1 BY SRI.PRAVEEN K.UPPAR, HCGP) FOR R2)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2017 PASSED BY THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, LAXMESHWAR IN C.C.NO. 1046 OF 2017 (PC NO. 35 OF 2015) IN TAKING COGNIZES FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 408, 409, 420 AND 468 READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND ISSUING THE PROCESS AND ALLOW THE ABOVE CRIMINAL PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri. N.J.Appannavar, the learned counsel for the
petitioners submit that the matter has been settled before the Lok Adalath and therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous.
In view of the above, IA No.1/2018 is dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
Vmb
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RIYAZ AHMED KADARSAB KALBURGI AND ANR.
IBRAHIMSAB HUSENSAB SIDDI
STATE OF KARNATAKA
P. KRISHNA BHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court