Petition for contempt under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, alleging non-compliance of a prior order. The court found that parties jointly submitted the direction was complied with and consequently dropped the petition.
The contempt petition was dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.C.C. NO.439 OF 2021
IN
W.P.NOS.7707-7711 OF 2019 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
DISTRICT - 577228.
2
DISTRICT - 577228.
(BY SRI SRIKANTH N V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
(BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR, HCGP)
THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.7707-7711/2019 (KLR-RES) DATED 06.09.2019 WHICH WAS DISPOSE OFF BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ISSUE SUCH OTHER DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS AS DEEM FIT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE INCLUDING COST OF THIS PETITION.
THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
This petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the direction contained in the order dated 6.9.2019 passed by this Court in W.P.No.7707-7711/2019.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
HR
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be entertained or dropped given the joint submission of compliance by the parties.
Whether the direction in W.P.No.7707-7711/2019 dated 06.09.2019 was complied with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT.MEENAKSHMMA AND OTHERS
NANDA KUMAR AND STATE
ALOK ARADHE
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
