This order excuses accused Nos. 3 and 4 from contempt proceedings for failing to reinstate a complainant because they were not original parties but took corrective steps after receiving notice. Liberty is granted for unpaid salary.
Contempt proceedings dropped against accused Nos. 3 and 4; liberty granted to Complainant for recovery of pending salary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
C.C.C. NO.369 OF 2021
IN
W.P.NO.52943 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SRI K M MURUGESHA, S/O LATE MARUTHI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/AT ALPPASANKAYTHARA KALYANA ILLAKHE HOLE NARASIPURA, HASSAN - 573201. ...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI V.S.LAKSHMINARAYANA, SR. COUNSEL FOR MISS ANUSHA L, ADVOCATE)
AND:
KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, ROOPA COMPLEX NO.179, II AND III FLOOR, I MAIN SHESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020.
2
MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573201.
(BY SRI NAGAIAH, ADVOCATE FOR A3 AND A4)
---THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN HE PRAYS THAT THE HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS UNDER CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT FOR DELIBERATE, WILFUL AND INTENTIONAL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER DATED 27.12.2019 PASSED IN W.P.NO.52943/2019, (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS C.C.C. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr. V.S. Lakshminarayana, learned senior counsel for
Miss Anusha L., learned counsel for the complainant.
Mr. Nagaiah, learned counsel for the accused Nos.3 and 4.
This petition has been filed for non-compliance of the direction contained in the interim order dated 27.12.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.52943/2019.
Emergent notice, petitioner shall not be relieved from services till next date of hearing, list a/w W.P.NO.23138/2018 and W.P.NO.50320/2019.
3
Supreme Court Cases 456.
4
parties to the writ petition on the date of passing of the aforesaid interim order.
to take recourse of such remedy as may be available to
5
him in law with regard to his grievance for payment of salary for the period from 1.10.2020 till 31.08.2021.
With the aforesaid liberty, the contempt proceeding
is dropped.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
HR
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Court should proceed with contempt proceedings against non-parties of the writ petition who complied with the order of the Court after notice.
Whether there was wilful disobedience of the direction contained in the interim order dated 27.12.2019.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sita Ram Vs. Balbir @ BaliReferred¶34
(2017) 2 Supreme Court Cases 456
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr Nandakumar J.V
Mr Parmesh B.A
Mr Jitendra
Mr Naveen
Allok Aradhe
Hemant Chandangoudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
