In a contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the bench noted that the impugned order had been complied with. Consequently, no further action was warranted, and the petition was disposed of.
The contempt petition is disposed of as the alleged order has been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
CCC NO.197/2021 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN
SUNITHA MARY LOPES W/O FRANCIS LOPES AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT ST ANTHONY NILAYA NEHRU NAGAR, 3RD CROSS SAGARA TOWN SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT WORKING AS JUNIOR ENGINEER IN KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD OPERATION BATCH-I, EE-I S E OFFICE, BTPS, KODTHINI BELLARY DISTRICT-587710 …COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI HANUMANTHAPPA B. HARAVI GOWDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND
V. PONNU RAJ MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD A GOVT. COMPANY HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.82, SHAKTHI BHAVAN RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE-560001 …ACCUSED (BY SRI AJAY J. NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE)
2
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR FLAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P.NO.58597/2017 DATED 15.12.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Perused the affidavit filed by Sri Girish S.R., Executive Engineer (Mechanical), Karnataka Power Corporation Limited stating that the representation of the complainant was decided on 15th June 2019. There is a controversy about the date on which a copy of the said order was served upon the complainant. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the complainant is that there are two different copies of the order dated 15th June 2019 bearing different inward numbers.
3
will be always open for the complainant to challenge the aforesaid order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
bkv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition warrants proceedings for alleged non-compliance of an order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhay S. Oka
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
