In a contempt petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, the complainant filed a memo stating that the impugned order had been complied with and thus requested not to prosecute. The Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2021
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
C.C.C NO. 172 OF 2020 (CIVIL)
BETWEEN
SRI G.S.NAGARJUNA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT No.83, VOMMASANDRA VILLAGE H.GOLLAHALLI POST MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563 131
...COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI UDAYA PRAKASH M, ADVOCATE)
AND
THE SECRETARY
THE CITIZEN HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL (AIDED) TAYALUR, MULABAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT – 563 131
ACCUSED
(BY SRI V.R.SARATHY, ADVOCATE FOR A2)
THIS C.C.C. IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 READ WITH ARTICLE
215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO TRY THE ACCUSED No.1 AND 2 FOR WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.16799/2016 (S-RES) DATED 08.08.2019 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND THEREBY CAUSE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ORDER OF THIS HON’BLE COURT AND ETC.,
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the second accused states that the order of which breach is alleged has been complied with.
petition. Hence, he has filed a memo to that effect.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/JUDGE
SN
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Abhay S. Oka
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
