Dismissed

Sri M R Jayaram v. the Assistant Commissioner

Karnataka HC2 Jan 2020WTA/3/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the Wealth Tax Appeal as the main issue was academic since the appellate tribunal granted the substantial relief sought. However, the issue regarding the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction to reopen the assessment remains open if the revenue prefers an appeal.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed with liberty to revive if revenue files an appeal against the Tribunal's order.

Sri M R Jayaram Vs the Assistant Commissioner — Income Tax | Karnataka HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF JANUARY 2020

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SANJAY GOWDA

¶8

W.T.A.NO.3/2019

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. M.R. JAYARAM GOKULA HOUSE GOKULA MATHIKERE BENGALURU – 560 054.

¶11

…APPELLANT

¶12

(BY SRI. S. SHANKAR, SR. COUNSEL A/W SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH - TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), BMTC BUILDING, 6^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU - 560 095.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WEALTH TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 27A OF THE WEALTH TAX ACT, 1957 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT AND ALLOW THE APPEAL OF THE

¶18

¶19

APPELLANT AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘C’ BENCH BANGALORE IN CO. NO.122/BANG/2018 ARISING OUT OF WTA 45/BANG/2018 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20092010 DATED 20.11.2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-A.

¶20

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ARAVIND KUMAR J , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

We have heard Sri.A.Shankar, learned Senior counsel appearing for appellant and Sri.K.V.Aravind, learned panel counsel appearing for respondent.

¶23

We find that grounds urged, issue involved and substantial question raised in this appeal are all academic in nature, inasmuch as, substantial relief which appellant had sought for before tribunal has been granted. However, issue relating to right of the Assessing Officer to issue notice under Section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, for re-opening the assessment has not been dealt by the tribunal, though assessee had filed cross-objections. Hence, present appeal has been

¶24

¶25

preferred by the assessee, being aggrieved by the order of rejection of cross-objections by tribunal.

¶26

Sri.A.Shankar, learned senior counsel

¶27

appearing for appellant is correct in contending that in the event of revenue were to come in appeal against the order of the tribunal granting relief to the assessee, appellant herein should be permitted to pursue its grievance with regard to the very jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in issuing the notice for re-opening.

¶28

The issue relating to re-opening of

¶29

assessment being academic in nature and as on date there being no appeal filed by the revenue against grant of relief to assessee, we do not propose to go into the right of Assessing Officer to reopen the assessment particularly in the backdrop of revenue having not filed any appeal against the order of tribunal whereunder substantial relief to the assessee has already been granted. As such, this appeal is dismissed/disposed of with liberty to the assessee to revive this appeal in the

¶30

¶31

event of revenue preferring or filing appeal against the

¶32

order of tribunal dated 27.11.2018.

¶33

SD/JUDGE

¶34

SD/JUDGE

¶35

Sri M R Jayaram v. the Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri M R Jayaram v. the Assistant Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt v v Vijayalakshmi Vs B.S.Shekarappa

Shri v G Nischay Vs Smt Shree Roopa

Shri v G Nischay Vs Smt. Shree Roopa

Sri M R Kodandaram Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Sri M R Anandaram Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Sri M R Janakiram Vs the Assistant Commissioner