The petitioner prayed to quash an order passed by Respondent No. 2. The impugned order was withdrawn by an Office Order dated 23 November 2020. As nothing survived, the petition was disposed of without further adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. ABHAY S.OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO.9931 /2020 (GM-RES-PIL)
BETWEEN:
Sri. S.Arunachalam S/o Late Chikka Subbachari Aged about 52 years, R/at No.1, 4th Cross 3rd Main, Ä Sector” Amruthanagar Sahakaranagar Post Bengaluru-560 092. .…PETITIONER (By Sri Kumbar Vasant Fakeerappa, Adv.)
AND:
2
Kumara Park West Bengaluru-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
(By Sri Jeevan J. Neeralgi, AGA for R1, Sri Unnikrishnan, CGC for R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER / DECISION DATED 08.07.2020 PASSED BY R-2 VIDE AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Perused the annexure to the memo submitted by the Advocate for respondent No.2 across the bar. By Office Order dated 23rd November 2020, the Note/Order dated 8th July 2020 which is the subject matter of challenge in this petition has been withdrawn. Hence, nothing survives in the petition and the same is disposed of.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
KK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri. S.Arunachalam
The State of Karnataka
The Commissioner Bangalore Development Authority
Abhay S. Oka
S. VishwaJith Shetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
