The High Court of Karnataka dismissed a writ petition filed seeking quashing of a Lokayukta order on the basis of a withdrawal memo filed by the petitioners. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V. HOSMANI
WRIT PETITION No. 52212 OF 2019 (GM-KLA)
BETWEEN :
(BY SHRI ARVIND M. NEGLUR , ADVOCATE)
AND :
2
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 28.08.2019 PASSED BY THE R-1 WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE – E TO THIS WRIT PETITION. GRANT AN INTERIM ORDERR TO STAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDER DATED 28.08.2019 PASSED BY THE R-1 AT ANNEXURE – E TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a memo for withdrawal of writ petition has been filed.
Hence, permission may be granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is perused.
3
Writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed and
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVK
Shri Munindra Kumar K.A & Others
The Karnataka Lokayukta
B.V. Nagarathna
Ravi V. Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
