Vasu Bhimasena v. State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged LS revenue recommendation to withhold 50% pension. HCG dismissed writ as merits examination would prejudice pending show cause notice adjudication, reserving liberty for future challenge against adverse order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
W.P.No.4413/2020 (GM-KLA)
BETWEEN:
VASU BHIMASENA S/O LATE BEHMASENA ACHAR AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O 22/A, 3RD CROSS LINK ROAD, S.N.PET, BELLARY – 583 101.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVIKUMAR BHANDARI, ADVOCATE A/W SRI.PHANIRAJ KASHYAP, ADVOCATE)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can express an opinion on merits of a pending disciplinary enquiry involving pension withholding.
Whether the writ petition challenging the revenue recommendation for penalty can be decided while the show cause notice proceeds.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vasu Bhimasena S/O Late Behmasena Achar
- respondent
State of Karnataka
- respondent
Karnataka Lokayukta Office
- respondent
Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/4413/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court