Petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. On preliminary hearing, the petitioner moved to withdraw the petition. The Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal proposition was established.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO.15968 OF 2013 (LB-BMP)
Between:
K.Sampangiram Reddy S/o. late D.Krishna Reddy Aged about 61 years Residing at No.147 7th cross, Indiranagar II stage Bangalore – 560 038 ... Petitioner
(By Sri K.V.Girish, Advocate (Physical Hearing))
And:
Bangalore – 560002
.. Respondents
(By Sri. K.N.Puttegowda, Advocate for R1 and R2 (video conferencing)
2
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the circular dt.28.9.2012 issued by R-1 vide Annx-A and etc.,
This Writ Petition coming on for Preliminary Hearing in ‘B’ group, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a
memo seeking to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
in terms of the memo.
Sd/JUDGE
HJ
K.Sampangiram Reddy
The Commissioner, Bhruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
Assistant Director, Town Planning BBMP
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
