Dismissed

Shri.Roopesh Shrikant Vyas v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Nov 2020WP/147183/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash an order rejecting an application for conversion of agricultural land. The Court held that since an efficacious alternative remedy was available under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, the petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the appellate authority.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed on account of existence of alternative remedy; liberty reserved to approach appellate authority.

Shri.Roopesh Shrikant Vyas Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2020) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH

¶2

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020

¶3

BEFORE

¶4

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI

¶5

W.P. No.147183/2020 (KLR-CON)

¶6

BETWEEN

¶7

SHRI.ROOPESH SHRIKANT VYAS, AGE:45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O: CCB 52, OPP SHIVAJI PARK, SHAHPUR BELAGAVI-590003

¶8

SHRI. SANTOSH S/O SHRIVALLABH VYAS, AGE:43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS R/O: CCB 52, OPP SHIVAJI PARK, SHAHPUR BELAGAVI-590003

¶9

.....PETITIONERS

¶10

(BY SRI SANGRAM S KULKARNI, ADV.)

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TOWN PLANNING DEPARTMENT, OFFICVE OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001

¶13

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI D C COMPOUND, BELAGAVI-590001

¶14

…..Respondents

¶15

(BY SRI VINAYAK S. KULKARNI, AGA)

¶16

¶17

THIS PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 14.03.2020 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT No.2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI VIDE ANNEXURE-G BEARING No.138399 AND ETC.

¶18

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The petitioners have filed this writ petition being aggrieved by the order dated 14.03.2020 rejecting their application for conversion of agricultural land into non-agricultural purpose.

¶21

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Addl. Government Advocate, it is observed that the impugned order is an appealable order and appeal lies under Section 49-C of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

¶22

In view of the fact that the petitioners have got an efficacious alternative remedy as stated above, this writ petition is disposed of. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the appellate authority.

¶23

¶24

All the contentions of the parties are left open.

¶25

In view of disposal of the petition, pending

¶26

Interlocutory Applications do not survive for consideration.

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

Naa

Shri.Roopesh Shrikant Vyas v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri.Roopesh Shrikant Vyas v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

One Roof Solutions Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri.Amaragundappa S/O Basappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Maharudreshwar S/O Mrutyunjaya Sheelavantar Vs the Secretary

Shri.Rangappa S/O Hariyappa Lamani Vs Assistant Commissioner

Smt.Lalitha W/O Krishna Huddar Vs Basappa S/O Irappa Kothin

Sri.Yamanappa S/O Hariyappa Lamani Vs Sri.Rangappa S/O Hariyappa Lamani