Sri Mohammed Tahir v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION No.14386/2018 (S – RES)
BETWEEN
SRI MOHAMMED TAHIR AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O ABDUL WAHEED, R/AT NO.12, 4TH MAIN, MEENA MASJID ROAD, MATADAHALLI, R.T. NAGAR POST, BENGALURU – 560 032.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI NARAYANA SWAMY V.K., ADVOCATE (PHYSICAL HEARING))
AND
2
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI R.SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4 (PHYSICAL HEARING); SRI OMKAR KAMBI, ADVOCATE FOR R5 (VIDEO CONFERENCING))
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS CONCERNED TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED 20.06.2017 AT ANNEX-C, DATED 12.3.2018 AT ANNEX-E FOR APPOINTMENT AS R.F.O. FORTHWITH SUBJECT TO THE RESULT IN THE W.P. NO. 21451/2017 (S-KSAT) FILED BY THE PETITIONER NOW PENDING ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
stating that in view of the subsequent developments, this writ petition would not survive for further consideration and he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Cs CT:MJ
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sri Mohammed Tahir
The State of Karnataka
Mr. Syed Zohaibullah
M. Nagaprassanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court