This is a single bench order wherein the court disposed of multiple writ petitions as their subject matter had become infructuous, noting that the impugned appeal was already disposed of by the respondent authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 3rd day of July 2020
Before
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
Writ Petition Nos.143679-143684/2020 (KLR-RES)
Between
2
All the petitioners are Residing at Sirigeri Vilalge, Siriguppa Taluk, Ballari District-577516. ...Petitioners
(By Sri. K.Raghavendra Rao & Smt. V.Vidya, Advocates)
And
...Respondents
(By Sri. V.S.Kalasurmath, HCGP for R1 & R2)
3
These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution Of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction directing respondent No.2 to adjudicate the appeal Sum/Cum/Bhusu/Appeal/119/2011-12 dated 16.12.2011 at Annexure-A at the earliest and allow the writ petitions with costs.
These Writ Petitions coming on for Preliminary Hearing this day, Court made the following:
ORDER
The petitioners are before this Court under Article
226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to adjudicate the appeal bearing No.¸ÀA/PÀA/¨sÀƸÀÄ/119/2011-12 dated
16.12.2011 at Annexure-A at the earliest.
directed the learned High Court Government Pleader to take notice and to get instructions as to whether the subject appeal before respondent No.2 is pending or disposed of. Accordingly, the learned High Court Government Pleader, on instructions, files a memo
4
dated 02.07.2020 enclosing order dated 30.06.2020 passed by respondent No.2 under which the subject appeal is disposed of. The said memo is taken on record. A copy of the said memo along with the order passed in the appeal is served on the counsel for the petitioners.
The writ petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous, with liberty as sought by the petitioners.
Sd/JUDGE
Kms
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Harijana Hanumanthappa and others
State of Karnataka Department of Revenue
S.G. Pandit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
