Dismissed
Smt.D.Shaikan Bi W/O D. .Balakullayappa v. Pukharaj Jain S/O Sohanraj
Karnataka HCWP/108502/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH Dated this…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH Dated this…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 17th day of January 2020
Before
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
Writ Petition No.108502 of 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN
SMT.D.SHAIKAN BI W/O D. BALAKULLAYAPPA AGE: ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O: 3RD CROSS, PATEL NAGAR, 3RD WARD, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI. ...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.S. BETURMATH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K.L.PATIL, ADVOCATE)
A N D
PUKHARAJ JAIN, S/O SOHANRAJ, AGE: ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O: MAYURA HOME APPLIANCES, OLD BUS STAND ROAD, HOSAPETE, DIST: BALLARI. ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.V. SOMAPUR & SRI C.B. SHAKUNAVALLI, ADVOCATE FOR CAVEATOR/RESPONDENT)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 22.10.2018 PASSED BY PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAPETE IN O.S.NO.62/2017.
2
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that due to subsequent developments, the writ petition has rendered itself infructuous. The said submission is placed on record.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. All the contentions urged in this writ petition are kept open.
Sd/JUDGE
Kms
SMT.D.SHAIKAN BI
PUKHARAJ JAIN
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court