The High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petitions challenging an order of the Deputy Registrar as not pressed, following the petitioners' counsel's submission of a withdrawal memo.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9T H DAY OF JULY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK G NIJAGANNAVAR
WRIT PETITION NOS.106709-106713/2019 & WRIT PETITION NOS.108386- 108388/2019 (CS-RES)
BETWEEN:
2
... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI MRUTYUNJAY TATA BANGI, ADVOCATE.)
AND:
3
... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP, FOR R.1 AND R.2; SRI SRINAND A. PACHCHAPURE AND SRI RAJENDRA R. PATIL, ADVOCATES, FOR R.4;
R.3 – NOTICE SERVED, UNREPRESENTED.)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 1S T RESPONDENT BEARING NO.DRL/SOR/VICHARANE/43/2018-19 DATED 21.01.2019 COPY AS PER ANNEXURE-G, ETC.,.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that a memo for withdrawal of the petitions is filed in the office and prays for dismissal of the petitions as not pressed.
4
learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Mrk/-
Shri Shrishail Mallikarjun Vidyavardhak Sangha Kabbur
Sri Kempayya
Sri M.B.Pujar
Ashok G Nijagannavar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
