High Court of Karnataka dismissed Writ Petition No.106381/2019 held infructuous due to subsequent developments as per a memo dated 20.01.2020, pursuant to Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NO.106381/2019 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
U.PANCHAKSHARAPP S/O LATE U. MUDIMALLAPPA AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O: DOOR NO:81, WARD NO:8, HALLAD RASTE, HOOVENAHADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI. DAYANAND M BANDI, ADV.)
AND
2
4TH WARD, HOOVINAHADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI.
... RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 03.03.2018 PASSED BY THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HOOVINAHADAGALI IN O.S.NO.35/2012 ON ISSUE NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-F TO THE WRIT PETITION AND TO HOLD THAT THE COURT FEES PAID IN O.S.NO.35/2012 BY THE PLAINTIFF IS JUST AND PROPER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Memo dated 20.01.2020 is filed stating that due to
subsequent developments, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
Memo dated 20.01.2020 is placed on record. The
writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
JUDGE
JTR
U.PANCHAKSHARAPP
SMT.M.GAYATRAMMA
M.P.VIJAYAKUMAR
M.P.VEERABHADRAPPA
M.S. KOTRESHAPPA
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
