Petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the election process of a cooperative bank. The petitions were subsequently dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT
WRIT PETITION NOS.103430-434/2020 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN
2
R/O: KARMUDI, TQ: YALABURGA, DIST: KOPPAL. (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ P MUDHOL, ADVOCATE) AND
... PETITIONERS
3
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 18.12.2019 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURES-C, C1 AND TO POST PONE THE PRESENT ELECTION PROCESS AND TO RESCHEDULE ELECTION PROCESS A FRESH AFTER COMPLHING THE PROCEDURE BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to subsequent developments, the writ petitions have rendered infructuous.
The submission of the learned counsel is placed on record. The writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sh
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI.SUNIL S/O SRINIVASRAO KULAKARNI
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
S.G. PANDIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
