The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dismissed Writ Petition No. 100565/2018 as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted this development.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
: 1 : W.P.NO.100565/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO.100565/2018(GM-FC)
Between:
Petitioner
(By Ms. T.Poonkuzhari, Adv.. for Sri. V.M.Sheelavant, Adv.)
And
Respondents
(By Smt. Prafulla S. Naik, Advocate for C/R.2)
W.P.NO.100565/2018
: 2 :
This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 21.11.2017 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Dharwad in Ex.P.No.21/2015 produced at Annexure-E.
This petition coming for orders, this day, the Court made the following:
ORDER
Smt. T.Poonkuzhali, the learned counsel submitted that the petition has become infructuous and as such the petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
Placing such submission on record, the petition is dismissed as infructuous.
SKK
SD/JUDGE
Fakeeragouda s/o Siddanagouda Patil
Smt. Smita d/o Nijaguni Ulligeri
Kumari Sneha d/o Fakeeragouda Patil
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
