A writ appeal filed pursuant to Section 4 of the Karnataka High Courts Act, 1961 was dismissed by this Court because the appellant filed a withdrawal memo after the lower court remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
WRIT APPEAL No.1676 OF 2018 (SC/ST)
BETWEEN:
THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS EMPLOYEE’S CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED, A HOUSING SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER PROVISION OF THE KARNATAKA COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.419, 1ST FLOOR, 12TH CROSS, SADASHIVANGAR , BANGALORE-560 080.
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT IN OFFICE SRI D. NAGABHUSHANAM.
... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. CHETHAN B., ADVOCATE (THROUGH VC))
AND:
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
THE ABOVE NAMED RESPONDENT NOs.3 TO 17 ARE RESIDENT OF HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, JALA POST, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDITIONAL) TALUK, BANGALORE-560084.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI A.C.BALARAJ, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2;
SRI. LOKESH R., ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 11, 13, 14 AND 16; RESPONDENT NOS.12 AND 17 ARE SERVED)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURTS ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE WRIT APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 02.12.2014 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.45314/2013 [SC/ST] PASSED BY LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS
HON’BLE COURT AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER, WITH COSTS.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, NAGARATHNA J ., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that a memo has been filed seeking withdrawal of the appeal. He submitted that the learned Single Judge had remanded the matter to the second respondent for fresh consideration. Thereafter, the second respondent has passed a fresh order on 13.06.2019. Hence, the appeal
has been rendered infructuous.
Memo is perused.
Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
sma
THE MINISTRY OF COMMUNICATIONS EMPLOYEE'S CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION
SRI M. ANJINAPPA S/O LATE SRI. A.K.MUNIYAPPA
SMT. VENKATALAKSHMAMMA W/O SRI. M. MUNIYAPPA
SRI. MUNIKRISHNA S/O LATE SRI. A.K.MUNIYAPPA
B.V.Nagarathna
Ravi V.Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
