Dismissed
Kempamma v. Karagappa
Karnataka HCRSA/901/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal under Section 100 CPC for non-prosecution as the appellants failed to appear after multiple listings without representation.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
¶3
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
¶4
BEFORE
¶5
THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE NATARAJ RANGASWAMY
¶6
R.S.A. No. 901/2012
¶7
BETWEEN :
¶9
- Kempamma
¶10
- W/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah Aged 55 years
¶11
- A. Somaashekar
¶12
- S/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah Aged 41 years
¶13
- Munishamappa S/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
KEMPAMMA - W/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah
- appellant
A. SOMAASHEKAR - S/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah
- appellant
MUNISHAMAMPA - S/o. Muniyappa @ Appaiah
- respondent
KARAGAPPA - S/o. late Muniyappa @ Appaiah
- respondent
HEMANNA - S/o. late Muniyappa @ Appaiah
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- RSA/901/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court