Disposed
Mr. Thomas V.V v. the Managing Director
Karnataka HCMFA.CROB/24/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
MFA CROB.NO.24 OF 2019 (MV-D) IN MFA NO.1185 OF 2018 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1 . MR. THOMAS V.V S/O VARKEY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
2 . MRS.ANNAMMA THOMAS W/O THOMAS V.V. AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
3 . MISS. AMALA THOMAS D/O THOMAS V.V. AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT VARICKANICKAL MATTARA, VAYATHUR VATTIAMTHODE KANNUR, KERALA-670 705
....CROSS OBJECTORS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR .R, ADVOCATE)
2
AND:
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR B.M.T.C, K.H. ROAD SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU 560 027
….RESPONDENT
THIS MFA CROB IN MFA NO.1185/2018 IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC READ WITH SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT AGINST THE JUDGEMENT AND AWARD DATED:22.11.2017, PASSED IN MVC NO.2280/2016, ON THE FILE OF THE XXI ACMM., AND XXIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH25), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS MFA CROB COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, S.SUJATHA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the cross
objectors has filed memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the cross objection.
3
Memo is placed on record.
The cross appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
CA
Mr. Thomas V.V
Mrs. Anamma Thomas
Miss. Amala Thomas
The Managing Director B.M.T.C
S. Sujatha
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court