Disposed

Monappa Poojary v. Pramod

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2020MFA/600/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an e-Lok Adalat under M.A.D. Act, the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru conciliated a miscellaneous first appeal. The parties settled, and the insurance company agreed to pay an additional Rs. 30,000 to the claimant as full and final settlement.

What did the court decide?

Settlement of Rs. 30,000 by the respondent-Insurance Company, subject to payment within six weeks or interest at 9% p.a. The appeal disposed of on this joint memo.

Monappa Poojary Vs Pramod — Insurance | Karnataka HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE e-LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2020

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

¶7

¶8

SRI. VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 600/2019 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 753/2020)

¶10

BETWEEN

¶11

Monappa Poojary Now Aged 56 years, S/o Babu Poojary, R/o Tappalkottige House, Valal Post, Bajathoor Village, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District-574 201.

¶12

... Appellant

¶13

(By Sri. Vishwanatha Poojary K., Advocate)

¶14

AND

¶15

Pramod, Now aged 27 years, S/o Podiya, R/o No.2/3, Bengeru House, Mogru, Belthangady Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District-574 214.

¶16

The Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Prabhu Building, Opp. Aruna Talkies,

¶17

¶18

Main Road, Puttur, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District-574 201. ... Respondents

¶19

(By Sri. Jwala Kumar, Advocate for R-2)

¶20

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 07.08.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO. 169/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE e-LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present

¶24

through video conferencing. The learned Counsel appearing for the 2^nd Respondent – United India Insurance Company Limited, along with its representative are present.

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed

¶26

by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant (being authorized by the appellant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the 2^nd respondent - Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the 2^nd respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand only), in addition to

¶27

¶28

what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶29

The 2^nd Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶30

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be disbursed in favour of the appellant – claimant, on proper identification.

¶31

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶32

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

Sd/MEMBER

¶35

Rbv

Monappa Poojary v. Pramod

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Monappa Poojary v. Pramod

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri.Venkatesh Vs Sri.Adiveppa

Shivanna Vs M/S Transport Corporation of India Ltd.

Smt. Saritha Vs Sri P K Shiva Kumar

Lalitha Vs Dinesh P

Sowmya M Vs the Manager

Puttu Mugera Vs the Branch Manager