A miscellaneous first appeal filed under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants appeared neither themselves nor were represented.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M.F.A.No.1213/2013
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2020
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.1213/2013 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
(BY SRI P.B.RAJU & SRI P.S.JAGADISH, ADVOCATES)
AND:
M.F.A.No.1213/2013
2
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2012 PASSED BY XVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.7968/2009 ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
None appears for the appellants. The records
show that there was no representation for the appellants on the previous hearing dates also.
No.1/plaintiff opposes the adjournment on the ground that the plaintiff’s evidence before the trial Court is concluded.
interested in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KSR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT.AMMAYYAMMA W/O A.ANJANAPPA REDDY
SRI A.NARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE ANNAYAPPA
SMT.R.RAJESHWARI W/O M.M.MUNISAMAIAH
THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE
K.S.MUDAGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
