The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the Motor Accident Claims Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act for non-compliance of office objections despite the existence of a peremptory order dated 09.03.2020.
The appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
MFA NO.100855/2019 (MV)
BETWEEN:
(NOTE: APPELLANT NO.2 TO 4 BEING MINOR REP.BY NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1, SMT.PINKI DEVI W/O PAPPU RAVIDAS @ PAPPU KUMAR @ PAPPU DAS RAVIDAS R/O: SHAHAPUR VILLAGE POST KORMA, TQ: BHAGALPUR, DIST: JEHANABAD, PIN CODE: 804432).
: 2 :
: 3 :
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, AGAISNT THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 30.01.2018 PASSED IN MVC NO.2579/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PEITIION FILED UNDER SECTION 163-A OF M.V.ACT.
THIS MFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, B.A.PATIL J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned proxy counsel for the appellants prays time to comply with the office objections. As per peremptory order dated 09.03.2020, steps have not been taken. Hence, in view of the peremptory order dated 09.03.2020 the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
Lad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow an appeal against dismissal due to non-compliance with office objections.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt.Pinki Devi
Miss Shushma
Miss Khushaboo
Miss Priyanka
Bihadas
Mrs.Kanti Devi
B.A.Patil
M.I.Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
